dataset string | split string | n int64 | task_A_param_regression dict | task_B_doa dict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
mandipgoswami/foa-acoustics-bench | test_hard | 389 | {
"metric": "mean per-descriptor MAE (lower is better)",
"baseline": "mean-predictor floor (predict the training-mean of each descriptor)",
"per_descriptor_MAE": {
"t60_measured": 1.7801,
"drr_db": 6.0215,
"c50_db": 5.4696,
"edt_s": 0.5905
},
"overall_mean_MAE": 3.4654
} | {
"metric": "mean great-circle angular error (deg)",
"baseline": "active-intensity vector",
"mean_angular_error_deg": 0,
"note": "near-zero by construction (single clean direct-path direction per clip); see dataset card. Task B is a correctness check / starting point for multi-source extensions."
} |
FOA-Acoustics-Bench
Blind room-acoustic parameter estimation and source direction-of-arrival (DOA) from 4-channel First-Order Ambisonics (FOA).
FOA-Acoustics-Bench promotes single-channel blind acoustic analysis to the spatial / multi-channel setting that drives most current structured-audio research (DCASE SELD, FOA parameter estimation). Each item is a 3-second, 16 kHz, 4-channel FOA (ACN channel order, SN3D normalization) recording produced by convolving a seeded, license-clean synthetic excitation with a real room impulse response from the RIR-Bench-Hard bank and encoding it along the geometric direct-path direction. Every clip is annotated with ground-truth acoustic parameters and source azimuth/elevation.
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("mandipgoswami/foa-acoustics-bench", split="test_hard")
print(ds[0]) # foa_path, t60_measured, drr_db, c50_db, edt_s, azimuth_deg, elevation_deg, ...
Why this dataset
- Spatial, not mono. 4-channel FOA with exact DOA labels β the format active SELD/spatial pipelines consume.
- Dual task. (a) regress {T60, DRR, C50, EDT} from the ambisonic signal; (b) estimate source azimuth/elevation. Both from audio alone.
- Adversarial acoustics. Inherits RIR-Bench-Hard's five hard regimes (long T60, coupled rooms, near-field, low-DRR, non-shoebox), so reported numbers reflect deployment-hard conditions, not easy rooms.
- Reproducible & license-clean. Sources are seeded synthetic speech-like probe signals, not real speech (see Honesty note); the whole set regenerates from seeds.
Composition
| count | |
|---|---|
| clips | 2,595 (one per valid RIR) |
| channels | 4 (FOA, ACN/SN3D: W, Y, Z, X) |
| sample rate | 16 kHz |
| duration | 3.0 s each |
| total audio | ~997 MB |
Splits (inherited from RIR-Bench-Hard, weighted toward hard conditions): train 1,946 Β· dev 260 Β· test_hard 389. Regimes: long_t60 520 Β· low_drr 520 Β· near_field 520 Β· non_shoebox 519 Β· coupled_rooms 516.
Measured label ranges (per regime)
| regime | T60 (s) | DRR (dB) | C50 (dB) | EDT (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| long_t60 | 0.55 β 3.25 | β16.7 β 10.2 | β3.9 β 13.5 | 0.12 β 2.26 |
| low_drr | 1.94 β 8.39 | β16.0 β β5.7 | β1.6 β 5.1 | 0.86 β 2.00 |
| near_field | 0.21 β 0.48 | 5.6 β 24.8 | 11.2 β 33.6 | 0.02 β 2.40* |
| non_shoebox | 0.09 β 0.42 | β14.0 β 5.5 | 1.2 β 34.0 | 0.15 β 0.93 |
| coupled_rooms | 0.14 β 0.77 | β11.9 β 0.4 | β2.3 β 56.7 | 0.34 β 1.61 |
*A small number of near-impulsive RIRs yield unstable EDT estimates; these are retained but EDT should be treated with caution on near_field (see Limitations).
Fields
id, category, split, foa_path (4-ch WAV), fs, duration_s, t60_measured, drr_db, c50_db, edt_s, azimuth_deg [β180,180], elevation_deg [β90,90], distance_m, room_dims, source_excitation, seed, valid.
Tasks & baselines
Task A β acoustic-parameter regression (primary): predict {T60, DRR, C50, EDT} from the FOA signal; metric = mean per-descriptor MAE on test_hard, lower is better.
Task B β source DOA: estimate (azimuth, elevation); metric = mean great-circle angular error (deg).
A reference active-intensity DOA baseline is included in eval/. Honest note on its number: because each clip encodes a single direct-path direction into an otherwise clean mix, the intensity estimator recovers azimuth/elevation near-exactly (mean angular error β 0Β° on test_hard). This confirms the ambisonic encoding is physically correct, but it also means Task B is only meaningful under added interference/diffuseness β so Task B is positioned as a correctness check and a starting point for multi-source extensions, while Task A (parameter regression under adversarial reverberation) is the substantive benchmark.
Honesty note (read before using)
The source audio is synthetic speech-like probe signal (seeded harmonic+formant voiced segments with fricative-like unvoiced bursts), not real speech. This is a deliberate, defensible choice for an evaluation set: it is fully reproducible, license-clean, and isolates the acoustic channel. It does not substitute for natural-speech evaluation. The room impulse responses are real (physics-simulated) and are the acoustic ground truth.
Related
Part of a room-acoustics evaluation program:
- RIR-Bench-Hard β the single-channel adversarial RIR benchmark this is built on
- audio-eval-suite Β· reverb-speech-mini
- seld-synth-mini β the companion synthetic SELD set
Limitations
- Synthetic (not natural) sources β see Honesty note.
- First-order only (no higher-order ambisonics).
- Single direct-path source per clip; diffuse/multi-source conditions are future work.
- EDT on near-impulsive
near_fieldRIRs can be numerically unstable.
Citation
@misc{goswami2026foaacousticsbench,
title = {FOA-Acoustics-Bench: Blind Room-Acoustic Parameter and Direction-of-Arrival Estimation from First-Order Ambisonics},
author = {Mandip Goswami},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://huggingface.co/datasets/mandipgoswami/foa-acoustics-bench}}
}
License: CC-BY-4.0.
- Downloads last month
- 71