Rapidata/Flux-2-pro_t2i_human_preference
Viewer
•
Updated
•
44.9k
•
1.52k
•
8
Marian Kannwischer
canwiper
AI & ML interests
RLHF & Computer Vision
Recent Activity
liked
a dataset
26 days ago
Rapidata/Flux-2-pro_t2i_human_preference
liked
a dataset
about 1 month ago
Rapidata/text-2-audio-human-preference-benchmark
liked
a dataset
about 2 months ago
Rapidata/Face_Generation_Benchmark
Organizations
liked
a
dataset
26 days ago
liked
a
dataset
about 1 month ago
liked
2
datasets
about 2 months ago
liked
a
dataset
3 months ago
upvoted
2
articles
4 months ago
Article
(LoRA) Fine-Tuning FLUX.1-dev on Consumer Hardware
- +3
•
95
Article
Using LoRA for Efficient Stable Diffusion Fine-Tuning
•
80
liked
2
datasets
4 months ago
liked
4
datasets
5 months ago
Rapidata/image-to-video-human-preference-hailuo-02-marey
Viewer
•
Updated
•
98
•
481
•
11
Rapidata/text-2-video-human-preferences-seedance-1-pro
Viewer
•
Updated
•
1.09k
•
1.22k
•
9
Rapidata/text-2-video-human-preferences-kling-v2.1-master
Viewer
•
Updated
•
1.19k
•
47
•
9
Rapidata/text-2-video-human-preferences-genmo-mochi-1
Viewer
•
Updated
•
1.1k
•
992
•
9
liked
a
dataset
6 months ago
reacted to
jasoncorkill's
post with 🚀
7 months ago
Post
2439
Imagine you could have an Image Arena score equivalent at each checkpoint during training. We released the first version of just that:
Crowd-Eval
Add one line of code to your training loop and you will have a new real human loss curve in your W&B dashboard.
Thousands of real humans from around the world rating your model in real time at the cost of a few dollars per checkpoint is a game changer.
Check it out here: https://github.com/RapidataAI/crowd-eval
First 5 people to put it in their loop get 100'000 human responses for free! (ping me)
Crowd-Eval
Add one line of code to your training loop and you will have a new real human loss curve in your W&B dashboard.
Thousands of real humans from around the world rating your model in real time at the cost of a few dollars per checkpoint is a game changer.
Check it out here: https://github.com/RapidataAI/crowd-eval
First 5 people to put it in their loop get 100'000 human responses for free! (ping me)
reacted to
jasoncorkill's
post with 👀
7 months ago
Post
3999
Benchmark Update:
@google
Veo3 (Text-to-Video)
Two months ago, we benchmarked @google ’s Veo2 model. It fell short, struggling with style consistency and temporal coherence, trailing behind Runway, Pika, @tencent , and even @alibaba-pai .
That’s changed.
We just wrapped up benchmarking Veo3, and the improvements are substantial. It outperformed every other model by a wide margin across all key metrics. Not just better, dominating across style, coherence, and prompt adherence. It's rare to see such a clear lead in today’s hyper-competitive T2V landscape.
Dataset coming soon. Stay tuned.
Two months ago, we benchmarked @google ’s Veo2 model. It fell short, struggling with style consistency and temporal coherence, trailing behind Runway, Pika, @tencent , and even @alibaba-pai .
That’s changed.
We just wrapped up benchmarking Veo3, and the improvements are substantial. It outperformed every other model by a wide margin across all key metrics. Not just better, dominating across style, coherence, and prompt adherence. It's rare to see such a clear lead in today’s hyper-competitive T2V landscape.
Dataset coming soon. Stay tuned.
- 5 replies
reacted to
jasoncorkill's
post with ❤️
8 months ago
Post
2881
🔥 Hidream I1 is online! 🔥
We just added Hidream I1 to our T2I leaderboard (https://www.rapidata.ai/leaderboard/image-models) benchmarked using 195k+ human responses from 38k+ annotators, all collected in under 24 hours.
It landed #3 overall, right behind:
- @openai 4o
- @black-forest-labs Flux 1 Pro
...and just ahead of @black-forest-labs Flux 1.1 Pro, @xai-org Aurora and @google Imagen3.
Want to dig into the data? Check out our dataset here:
Rapidata/Hidream_t2i_human_preference
What model should we benchmark next?
We just added Hidream I1 to our T2I leaderboard (https://www.rapidata.ai/leaderboard/image-models) benchmarked using 195k+ human responses from 38k+ annotators, all collected in under 24 hours.
It landed #3 overall, right behind:
- @openai 4o
- @black-forest-labs Flux 1 Pro
...and just ahead of @black-forest-labs Flux 1.1 Pro, @xai-org Aurora and @google Imagen3.
Want to dig into the data? Check out our dataset here:
Rapidata/Hidream_t2i_human_preference
What model should we benchmark next?
reacted to
jasoncorkill's
post with ❤️
8 months ago
Post
5544
🚀 Building Better Evaluations: 32K Image Annotations Now Available
Today, we're releasing an expanded version: 32K images annotated with 3.7M responses from over 300K individuals which was completed in under two weeks using the Rapidata Python API.
Rapidata/text-2-image-Rich-Human-Feedback-32k
A few months ago, we published one of our most liked dataset with 13K images based on the @data-is-better-together 's dataset, following Google's research on "Rich Human Feedback for Text-to-Image Generation" (https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.10240). It collected over 1.5M responses from 150K+ participants.
Rapidata/text-2-image-Rich-Human-Feedback
In the examples below, users highlighted words from prompts that were not correctly depicted in the generated images. Higher word scores indicate more frequent issues. If an image captured the prompt accurately, users could select [No_mistakes].
We're continuing to work on large-scale human feedback and model evaluation. If you're working on related research and need large, high-quality annotations, feel free to get in touch: [email protected].
Today, we're releasing an expanded version: 32K images annotated with 3.7M responses from over 300K individuals which was completed in under two weeks using the Rapidata Python API.
Rapidata/text-2-image-Rich-Human-Feedback-32k
A few months ago, we published one of our most liked dataset with 13K images based on the @data-is-better-together 's dataset, following Google's research on "Rich Human Feedback for Text-to-Image Generation" (https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.10240). It collected over 1.5M responses from 150K+ participants.
Rapidata/text-2-image-Rich-Human-Feedback
In the examples below, users highlighted words from prompts that were not correctly depicted in the generated images. Higher word scores indicate more frequent issues. If an image captured the prompt accurately, users could select [No_mistakes].
We're continuing to work on large-scale human feedback and model evaluation. If you're working on related research and need large, high-quality annotations, feel free to get in touch: [email protected].
liked
a
dataset
8 months ago
liked
a
dataset
9 months ago