cloudyu commited on
Commit
0fd1ff5
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): f178779

Model card: Plan-RewardBench (ACL 2026)

Browse files
Files changed (2) hide show
  1. README.md +10 -1
  2. agent_judge_planrb.png +0 -0
README.md CHANGED
@@ -66,7 +66,15 @@ about 300 ms per decision (4× playback).
66
 
67
  <video src="https://huggingface.co/autotrust/JEV-27B-VL/resolve/main/videos/vl5.mp4" controls autoplay loop muted playsinline width="100%"></video>
68
 
69
- ## Highlight: agent judge (AgentRewardBench)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
70
 
71
  Did the web agent really finish the task? Given the user's goal, the agent's actions and final message, and the final
72
  screenshot, System 1 returns P(task completed) in one forward pass, zero-shot. On
@@ -198,6 +206,7 @@ Human gold labels (CLINC-150, MTOP, GoEmotions, DBpedia), 800 items.
198
  | task | result | comparison |
199
  |---|---|---|
200
  | **Image recommendation, zero-shot** (MicroLens, covers only) · JEV-27B-VL | **AUC 0.727** | collaborative filtering from 59,045 users' logs 0.728 · titles only 0.649 |
 
201
  | **Agent judge** (AgentRewardBench, 1,302 trajectories) · JEV-27B-VL | **higher precision than all 16 leaderboard judges** at their recall; AUROC 0.91 | o4-mini, GPT-4o, Claude 3.7, trained 7B judges |
202
  | **Multimodal judge** (VL-RewardBench, 1,247 pairs) · JEV-27B-VL | **78.3% accuracy**, above every model on its 2025 leaderboard | Skywork-VL-Reward-7B 73.3 · GPT-4o 65.8 · Claude 3.5 Sonnet 55.3 |
203
  | **Multimodal judge** (MMRB2, 4 × 1,000 pairs) · JEV-27B-VL | text-to-image **69.2**, average **63.8** | GPT-5 70.5 / 72.2 · GPT-4.1 65.8 / 63.5 · GPT-4o 60.3 / 59.7 |
 
66
 
67
  <video src="https://huggingface.co/autotrust/JEV-27B-VL/resolve/main/videos/vl5.mp4" controls autoplay loop muted playsinline width="100%"></video>
68
 
69
+ ## Highlight: agent judge
70
+
71
+ **Plan-RewardBench (ACL 2026).** Which of two complete trajectories of a tool-using agent is better? On 1,171 pairs (planning,
72
+ error recovery, safe refusal, tool irrelevance), System 1 reaches **73.2%** macro-average accuracy, the top of the paper's
73
+ table (Table 4): Qwen-Plus 70.0, DeepSeek-V3.2 69.6, Inf-ORM-Llama3.1-70B 69.2, Gemini-3-Flash 69.1, GPT-5 68.5.
74
+
75
+ ![Plan-RewardBench](agent_judge_planrb.png)
76
+
77
+ **AgentRewardBench (2025, with screenshots).**
78
 
79
  Did the web agent really finish the task? Given the user's goal, the agent's actions and final message, and the final
80
  screenshot, System 1 returns P(task completed) in one forward pass, zero-shot. On
 
206
  | task | result | comparison |
207
  |---|---|---|
208
  | **Image recommendation, zero-shot** (MicroLens, covers only) · JEV-27B-VL | **AUC 0.727** | collaborative filtering from 59,045 users' logs 0.728 · titles only 0.649 |
209
+ | **Agent judge** (Plan-RewardBench, ACL 2026, 1,171 pairs) · JEV-27B-VL | **73.2%**, top of the paper's table | Qwen-Plus 70.0 · Gemini-3-Flash 69.1 · GPT-5 68.5 |
210
  | **Agent judge** (AgentRewardBench, 1,302 trajectories) · JEV-27B-VL | **higher precision than all 16 leaderboard judges** at their recall; AUROC 0.91 | o4-mini, GPT-4o, Claude 3.7, trained 7B judges |
211
  | **Multimodal judge** (VL-RewardBench, 1,247 pairs) · JEV-27B-VL | **78.3% accuracy**, above every model on its 2025 leaderboard | Skywork-VL-Reward-7B 73.3 · GPT-4o 65.8 · Claude 3.5 Sonnet 55.3 |
212
  | **Multimodal judge** (MMRB2, 4 × 1,000 pairs) · JEV-27B-VL | text-to-image **69.2**, average **63.8** | GPT-5 70.5 / 72.2 · GPT-4.1 65.8 / 63.5 · GPT-4o 60.3 / 59.7 |
agent_judge_planrb.png ADDED