Nanthasit commited on
Commit
60f2dfc
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): fed4024

Remove unearned model-index claims; state measured results or mark as unbenchmarked

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +25 -14
README.md CHANGED
@@ -24,20 +24,6 @@ datasets:
24
  - Nanthasit/sakthai-irrelevance-supplement
25
  metrics:
26
  - accuracy
27
- model-index:
28
- - name: sakthai-context-0.5b-tools
29
- results:
30
- - task:
31
- type: text-generation
32
- name: Tool-Calling
33
- dataset:
34
- name: sakthai-combined-v6
35
- type: Nanthasit/sakthai-combined-v6
36
- metrics:
37
- - type: accuracy
38
- value: 0.8
39
- name: Score (4/5)
40
- verified: true
41
  ---
42
 
43
  <h1 align="center">SakThai 0.5B — Tools (LoRA)</h1>
@@ -168,3 +154,28 @@ These models are new or specialised — downloads are low but they're production
168
  ## License
169
 
170
  Apache 2.0 (following the Qwen2.5 base model license).
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
24
  - Nanthasit/sakthai-irrelevance-supplement
25
  metrics:
26
  - accuracy
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
27
  ---
28
 
29
  <h1 align="center">SakThai 0.5B — Tools (LoRA)</h1>
 
154
  ## License
155
 
156
  Apache 2.0 (following the Qwen2.5 base model license).
157
+
158
+ ## Evaluation
159
+
160
+ Measured on [sakthai-bench-v1](https://huggingface.co/datasets/Nanthasit/sakthai-bench-v1)
161
+ (235 rows, balanced; full per-category results archived in that repo under `results/`):
162
+
163
+ | category | selection |
164
+ |---|---:|
165
+ | simple | 1/70 — 1.4% |
166
+ | parallel | 1/70 — 1.4% |
167
+ | irrelevance (tools offered) | 63/70 — 90.0% |
168
+ | irrelevance (no tools) | 25/25 — 100% |
169
+ | **overall** | **38.3%** |
170
+
171
+ **Read this honestly: this model rarely calls tools.** It reliably declines when no
172
+ tool applies, but on requests that need one it usually replies in prose instead of
173
+ emitting a `<tool_call>`. Its format is correct when it does fire, so this is a
174
+ training-signal limitation rather than a parsing problem.
175
+
176
+ A previous version of this card claimed a tool-calling score of 4/5 (0.80). That
177
+ figure came from a five-example internal spot check, not from a benchmark, and the
178
+ measurement above contradicts it. It has been removed.
179
+
180
+ A fix is in progress — prompt-masked training scores 89.8% selection on the same
181
+ benchmark — and this card will be updated when a replacement is promoted.